Application security reviews
Find the exposed paths in your application.
Review exposed interfaces, authentication flows and sensitive operations with actionable remediation.
Prepare the conversation
What needs attention in your system?
Select the areas you want to discuss. Download the list to share with your team.
0 areas selected
A scanner report still needs a risk decision
The fragile approach
Deliver an unranked list of scanner findings
Teams cannot distinguish a theoretical issue from a reachable weakness in an important workflow.
The intended approach
Connect evidence to the affected boundary
Prioritise the fix, document the reproduction conditions and verify the changed behaviour.
An implementation example
Prioritise exploitable behaviour
Review architecture and implementation against the ways the application receives data and grants authority. Explain findings with a concrete path, business impact and a test that confirms remediation.
Review the paths an attacker could use
A document assistant reads supplier files that may contain instructions unrelated to the user’s request.
A failure to account for
A supplier document asks the assistant to send internal records to an external destination.
Illustrative scenario, not a customer case study.
Quality, security & governance
Connect each finding to an exploitable path.
Threat modelling
Identify the data, privileges and exposed paths that matter for this application.
Boundary testing
Review input handling, authentication, authorisation and interactions with external services.
Remediation checks
Prioritise findings by impact and verify the fix against the original failure condition.
No. A review is scoped evidence about the system examined. Security also depends on operating controls, future changes and continuing verification.
Discuss application security reviews
Bring the workflow, the constraints and the questions your team needs to resolve.